โ† Frame Chains

๐Ÿ‘‘ Succession Without Elections

Knock out the leader. Nobody votes. Nobody fights. The rules were signed in advance โ€” and a slow network can never crown the wrong machine.

Analogy: a lifeguard chair with a posted rota. The lifeguard renews a sand-timer while on duty. If the timer runs ALL the way out, the #2 on the rota waits one extra beat (and #3 waits two) before climbing up โ€” so a #3 who merely heard late can never jump the queue. When #1 comes back, they wait for the timer's boundary, then take the chair back. Every change is written in the logbook, in ink.
The control chain โ€” signed frames, appended only, never rewritten.
What am I looking at? The roster (who's #1, #2, #3) is a signed frame minted in advance. Every tick the leader writes carries a short lease. Only when a lease fully expires may the next rank act โ€” and rank r must wait (rโˆ’1) extra grace beats, so latency can't cause a coup: the laggy #3 just ends up waiting longer, never jumping in early. When the old leader returns it defers until the current lease's boundary, then writes a resumption frame. History is never edited โ€” you can scroll the logbook and replay exactly who led when, and why. That's ยง3.5 โ€” proven in the paper's five-scenario harness (A1โ€“A5) plus a live two-hour lease.